Iron Motors built on scams: Vladimir Filippov laundered 8M in Ukraine stolen via Moscow real estate fraud

25 апреля 2026 г.

Beneath the surface of the “successful” Iron Motors company is the criminal history of its founder, Vladimir Filippov—a career conman previously convicted for large-scale fraud, forging signatures, and embezzling millions from unsuspecting clients.

We are publishing the documentary evidence of Filippov’s criminal record to expose the true nature of the Iron Motors owner and reveal the reality behind his business persona—a seasoned fraudster whose path to success involved a prison sentence and the deliberate deception of those who trusted him.

Vladimir Filippov, who positions himself as a successful importer of used US cars to Ukraine and Moldova through Iron Motors, has not only debt-related lawsuits but also a conviction for fraud.

learned this 368.media from the Russian Federation’s court registry, where the businessman has long resided.

Vladimir Sergeyevich Filippov, a native of Bolhrad in the Odessa region, was born on August 19, 1988, and studied at the Finance Academy under the Government of Moscow (now a university). He lived in Moscow for a long time and, until recently, used the social network VKontakte, which is banned in Ukraine (he last visited his page on May 22, 2023). His last VK status read: "Strength is in will, will is in the fist!"

tidttiqzqiqkddrm ekideeixqieuatf dzxiqhuithiquqkmp

In 2012, Filippov found himself in trouble. On September 16, police in Moscow’s Tagansky District arrested him on suspicion of fraud. The complaint was filed by Sergei Vladimirovich Semenov (3/2 T. Shevchenko Street, Apt. 146). Semenov claimed that Filippov had embezzled 8 million rubles from him by selling his apartment, which he did not own. The property in question was located at 52/14 Zemlyanoy Val Street, Building 2, Apt. 128.

Filippov was detained while passing through Moscow. He was arrested by a court order, the hearing of which took place on January 17, 2013.

According to the investigation, between the spring of 2010 and June 23, 2011, Filippov, through deception and abuse of trust, illegally stole 8 million rubles from the victim.

Filippov and his wife

After receiving the full amount of money, he produced a document proving he was not the owner of the apartment. During the investigation, Filippov initially denied signing the preliminary agreement, the receipt, and the commitment documents, but after a handwriting examination established their authenticity, he advanced a new version—that he had signed the documents without reading them.

At the court hearing, V. S. Filippov pleaded not guilty. He was sentenced under Part 4 of Article 159 of the Russian Criminal Code to three years in a general regime penal colony. The victim’s claim for 8 million rubles in compensation was granted.

The convicted man filed an appeal, which was heard on April 17. In it, Filippov argued that the verdict was erroneous, asserted his innocence, and claimed to have been the victim of fraud. He claimed that the victims and his mother knew that he had actually sold his apartment in 2009. He claimed that the victims offered to help him return the apartment or obtain its true value, and at their suggestion, the semblance of a sale was created. Filippov stated that he trusted them completely, wrote receipts and signed documents without reading them.

Filippov’s claims of innocence, that he had no intention of selling the apartment, that he had not received any money, and that he was unaware of the contents of the documents he was signing, were examined by the court but were not substantiated. The defendant’s arguments about his ignorance of the documents’ contents do not stand up to scrutiny, as some of these documents were written in his own handwriting, as confirmed by forensic handwriting analysis. He was also personally present at the notary’s office when the preliminary agreement was signed in 2011.

The judge sided with the prosecution and dismissed the appeal. Therefore, Filippov was supposed to spend three years behind bars in Russia and be released in 2015. Given his time in custody, it can be assumed that the criminal served his sentence.

Incidentally, the court also noted that the victim had filed a similar complaint with Odessa law enforcement agencies, who refused to initiate criminal proceedings due to lack of jurisdiction.